Samsung Catching Up to Apple’s Raw Power? Interpreting Galaxy S26 Ultra Speed Claims

A Samsung flagship is expected to outperform the current iPhone in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks in 2026.

For years, the phrase “the iPhone is faster” barely needed debate. Apple’s custom silicon dominated benchmark charts and delivered industry-leading single and multi-core performance. That reputation shaped buyer expectations, reviewer narratives, and even casual tech conversations. Speed leadership simply became part of the iPhone identity.

Now, early reports surrounding the Galaxy S26 Ultra are challenging that long-standing assumption.

Leaked benchmark results suggest Samsung’s next flagship may edge past Apple’s current top iPhone silicon in both single-core and multi-core tests. If accurate, this would mark a notable shift in a rivalry where Apple traditionally held the raw performance crown.

The excitement stems from leaked Geekbench 6 scores attributed to the Galaxy S26 Ultra. These early figures indicate unusually strong CPU performance, with the device reportedly surpassing Apple’s latest iPhone.

For context, Apple often leads single-core metrics, while Android flagships sometimes compete more closely in multi-core workloads.

It’s important to remember that leaks are not confirmations. Benchmark databases can include prototype hardware, engineering samples, or misidentified devices. Scores may also change before launch due to software optimization, thermal tuning, or clock adjustments.

Still, when leaked numbers diverge meaningfully from historical trends, they naturally trigger discussion.

The core claim here is straightforward: Samsung’s next Ultra device may no longer trail Apple in raw CPU output. Whether that holds true at launch remains an open question.

Geekbench 6 is a synthetic benchmark designed to measure CPU performance across a range of simulated tasks. It produces two commonly cited metrics:

• Single-core score – reflects how fast one CPU core performs sequential tasks

• Multi-core score – reflects how efficiently all cores work together

Leaked results tied to the Galaxy S26 Ultra suggest scores around:

• Single-core: 3,852

• Multi-core: 11,738

By comparison, Apple’s recent flagship iPhone silicon typically posts lower multi-core numbers in this particular claim scenario. The reported gap implies roughly a 17–20% multi-core advantage for Samsung.

On paper, a multi-core lead of that size could benefit workloads that scale across cores, including:

• Heavy multitasking

• Gaming physics and background processes

• Content creation tasks

• AI-assisted operations

However, benchmark leads don’t automatically translate into noticeable user experience gains. Many everyday smartphone actions — launching apps, scrolling interfaces, messaging, browsing — rarely push modern flagship CPUs to their limits. Sustained performance, heat management, and software behavior often matter more than peak synthetic scores.

Benchmarks are best viewed as indicators, not verdicts.

At the center of these claims is Qualcomm’s next-generation chipset, commonly referenced in leaks as the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.

While official specifications remain unconfirmed, reports suggest the chip may use updated Oryon v3 CPU cores, Qualcomm’s custom architecture designed to compete more directly with Apple’s silicon strategy.

Oryon cores differ from traditional ARM reference designs by emphasizing higher instruction throughput and improved scaling. In simple terms, Qualcomm is moving toward deeper in-house CPU customization rather than relying purely on stock core layouts. This architectural shift is one reason performance expectations have risen.

The “For Galaxy” branding adds another layer.

Historically, Samsung’s Ultra devices have received specially tuned Snapdragon variants with slightly higher clock speeds or thermal allowances. This exclusive tuning can provide modest but measurable gains over standard Android implementations using the same base chip.

In practice, “For Galaxy” versions often aim to:

• Push peak CPU frequencies higher

• Improve burst responsiveness

• Differentiate Samsung’s flagship performance profile

That tuning advantage helps explain why Samsung devices sometimes outperform competitors even when sharing the same chipset family.

Speed claims rarely exist in isolation. Several rumored hardware changes surrounding the Galaxy S26 Ultra could influence overall performance perception.

Leaks suggest Samsung may move to 16GB of RAM as a default configuration. While many users won’t saturate that capacity, additional memory can help with:

• Aggressive multitasking

• Background app retention

• On-device AI features

This is particularly relevant as Samsung continues emphasizing Galaxy AI capabilities, which can increase memory demands depending on implementation.

Rumors also point to a so-called “Privacy Display” using a viewing-angle control approach sometimes described as “Flex Magic Pixel.” The concept is simple: reduce side visibility to deter shoulder-surfing. If implemented effectively, this would be more about usability and privacy than performance.

Another widely discussed change is a potential jump to 60W wired charging. Compared to Apple’s more conservative charging speeds, this would improve top-up times and daily convenience. Charging performance doesn’t affect CPU benchmarks, but it strongly shapes user satisfaction — often more than incremental processor gains.

Together, these rumored upgrades paint a picture of broader refinement rather than a single performance-driven redesign.

Even if Samsung claims a raw benchmark advantage, efficiency remains a separate discussion. Apple’s chip designs have historically excelled in performance-per-watt, meaning strong output with relatively low energy consumption. That balance contributes to battery life stability and sustained responsiveness under load.

Raw CPU scores emphasize peak capability. Efficiency metrics emphasize endurance and thermal behavior. A device can lead one category without dominating the other.

Real-world usage further complicates comparisons. Synthetic tests isolate specific workloads under controlled conditions. Daily smartphone behavior involves variable factors:

• Mixed CPU and GPU activity

• Background services

• Thermal limits

• OS-level scheduling

As a result, a benchmark victory may not guarantee a visibly faster device. Perceived smoothness often depends on software optimization, animation timing, and system stability.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra speed claims are interesting because they challenge a long-standing narrative rather than simply posting another high number. A potential multi-core lead suggests Qualcomm’s architectural changes and Samsung’s chip tuning strategy may be paying off.

Still, leaked benchmarks are snapshots, not outcomes. Final performance, efficiency, and user experience will only become clear after independent testing on retail hardware.

Raw power attracts headlines. Sustained performance and everyday usability determine whether those headlines matter.

Speaking of usability, enhance your Galaxy S26 Ultra experience with a thin phone case from ThinBorne. Enjoy MagSafe without compromising style!