Black Thinborne S25 Ultra case beside Black PITAKA S25 Ultra case on a platform

ThinBorne vs PITAKA S25 Ultra Case: Features, Pricing, & Perks (2026)

Geschrieben von: Angela

|

|

Lesezeit 8 min

Choosing between ultra-thin cases often comes down to the details. The PITAKA S25 Ultra case and the Thinborne S25 Ultra case are both built for minimalist Galaxy S25 Ultra users - offering slim profiles, aramid fiber construction, and MagSafe compatibility that preserves the phone’s original feel.


In many ways, they’re more alike than different, but that doesn’t mean they’re interchangeable. Rather than one being better than the other, these cases are designed for different types of users. 


From grip and included extras to warranty coverage and brand approach, each takes a slightly different path. This comparison looks beyond shared specs to highlight those differences - so you can choose the case that best fits how you actually use your phone.

🔑 Key Takeaways:

The PITAKA S25 Ultra Case and Thinborne S25 Ultra case are both ultra-thin, minimalist options.

Both use premium 600D aramid fiber for lightweight durability.

Coverage is similar: full back and sides of the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Both cases support MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging and magnetic accessories.

Thinborne emphasizes added value, extras, and a practical user experience.

ThinBorne vs. PITAKA S25 Ultra Case: Overview of Features

two ultra-thin aramid fiber cases for the Galaxy S25 ultra

At a glance, the PITAKA S25 Ultra case and the Thinborne S25 Ultra case aim for the same end goal: ultra-thin protection that preserves the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s original feel. Both are minimalist cases made from 600D aramid fiber, both support MagSafe-style magnetic accessories, and both avoid the bulky look of rugged cases.


Where they differ is not in core specs, but in how each brand approaches daily usability and ownership. Thinborne leans into a complete, user-first package, while the PITAKA S25 Ultra case reflects a more traditional premium-brand philosophy.


Here’s a side-by-side look at how their key features compare:


Feature

Thinborne S25 Ultra Case

PITAKA S25 Ultra Case

Thickness

0.04 in (1.02 mm)

0.037 in (0.95 mm)

Weight

0.75 oz (21.3 g)

0.84 oz (23.9 g)

Coverage

Full back and side coverage

Full back and side coverage

Material

600D aramid fiber

600D aramid fiber

Finish & Texture

Carbon fiber-style texture

Smooth, silky aramid weave

Grip

More tactile, slightly higher friction

Smoother in hand

MagSafe / Qi2 Support

Yes

Yes

Protection 

Scratch, scuff, and daily wear protection

Scratch, scuff, and daily wear protection

Price

$69.69

$54.99

Included Extras

Two tempered glass screen protectors

-

Warranty

6-month warranty

2-month warranty


The above comparison shows that while both cases deliver a similar minimalist experience, their strengths cater to different preferences. In the sections below, we’ll take a closer look at how these differences affect real-world use and long-term ownership.

📚 Also Read: Find out whether a Galaxy S26 Ultra case will fit the S25 Ultra - plus what design changes affect compatibility and fit.

Size & Coverage

Both cases offer full back and side coverage while keeping a low-profile silhouette. The PITAKA S25 Ultra case hugs the Galaxy S25 Ultra closely, maintaining a precise fit. 


Similarly, the Thinborne S25 Ultra case wraps the device in a slim aramid fiber shell designed to feel almost invisible once installed.


Since both cases target minimalist users, neither attempts to add aggressive impact buffers. Instead, coverage is designed for everyday protection - scratches, scuffs, and minor bumps (without altering how the phone looks or feels in the hand).

Design & Build

Design-wise, the PITAKA S25 Ultra case sticks closely to PITAKA’s established aesthetic: clean and unmistakably premium. The weave pattern is subtle, and the overall look pairs well with the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s refined design.


The Thinborne S25 Ultra case follows a similar minimalist direction but places more emphasis on precision detailing. Cutouts, edges, and button areas feel deliberate, and the case gives off a more utilitarian, performance-focused vibe.

Material & Finish

Both brands use 600D aramid fiber, which is widely considered the sweet spot for thin cases thanks to its fine weave and clean texture. As a result, the PITAKA S25 Ultra case and Thinborne S25 Ultra case feel premium, lightweight, and durable while remaining slim.


Because the material quality is so similar, the difference comes down to finish preference. The PITAKA S25 Ultra case has a smoother, silkier feel, while Thinborne’s carbon-fiber-inspired texture feels a bit more tactile. Neither approach is better - it simply depends on whether you prefer a smoother or slightly more textured surface.

Grip

Grip is one of the more noticeable differences between these two cases.


The PITAKA S25 Ultra case prioritizes a smooth in-hand experience. It feels refined and comfortable, but users with dry hands or those who often use their phone one-handed may find it slightly slippery.


Thinborne, on the other hand, places more emphasis on grip. Its textured finish introduces a bit more friction, making the phone feel more secure without becoming sticky or rough. For users concerned about accidental slips, this subtle difference can mean a lot.

MagSafe / Wireless Charging Compatibility

Both cases support magnetic accessories and wireless charging, making them compatible with modern MagSafe technology.


The PITAKA S25 Ultra case works seamlessly with magnetic chargers and mounts, especially within PITAKA’s own MagEZ lineup. The alignment is reliable, and charging performance remains stable.


The Thinborne S25 Ultra case also supports MagSafe and Qi2-compatible accessories, using a magnet array designed for secure attachment. 


In real-world use, both cases perform well in this aspect.

Protection

Neither case is designed for extreme drop protection, and both brands are transparent about that. 


The PITAKA S25 Ultra case focuses on protecting against scratches and everyday wear while preserving a barely-there feel.


Similarly, Thinborne provides low-profile protection meant for daily use rather than heavy impacts. Its aramid fiber shell adds structure without bulk, making it suitable for users who want protection without changing how their Galaxy S25 Ultra feels in their pocket or hand.

🗒️ Related Article: Find out whether a Galaxy S25 Ultra case will fit the S25 Edge - including the key size and design differences that affect compatibility.

Pricing

Both the Thinborne S25 Ultra case and the PITAKA S25 Ultra case are premium minimalist options, but their offerings differ.


Thinborne S25 Ultra Case - $69.69


Comes with two tempered glass screen protectors and a 6-month warranty.


PITAKA S25 Ultra Case - $54.99


Sold as a standalone case with a 2-month warranty; additional accessories are purchased separately.

PITAKA S25 Ultra Case Black
Image Credit: PITAKA

🛒 Buyer Guide: Explore the best Galaxy S25 Ultra cases in this comprehensive guide - comparing protection, design, materials, and real-world performance to help you choose the right one.

User Reviews

Thinborne vs. PITAKA customer reviews

Thinborne

Let’s take a look at some Amazon reviews for Thinborne:


Positive Reviews:

  • “Awesome. Feels great in the hands. Super thin. Rounded edges. Matte, doesn't make my hands slick.” - Jonathan

  • “Magnets for MagSafe charging and accessories are really strong!” - SP

  • “The build quality feels high end, and the design is clean and stylish without adding bulk.” - Tony

Not-So-Positive Reviews:

  • “I give a soft recommendation because of the price and lack of protection of the front.” - Just Sam.

  • “This one says Please note that this case provides minimal protection and is NOT for drop protection.” - yb

  • “I wish if there would be more color options if possible.” - Chrisy

PITAKA

Now let’s look at what Amazon reviewers are saying about the PITAKA S25 Ultra case:


Positive Reviews:

  • “Premium look and feel.” - manuel

  • “This case is extremely well built and has a high quality look that actually improves the appearance of your device.” - Brian Barnes

  • “I got this case for my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and it didn't disappoint. I prefer a case that is thin enough not to increase the size of the phone substantially, yet sturdy enough to offer decent protection.” - N. Garrett

Not-So-Positive Reviews:

  • “Love the case but expensive.” - R.Arrington

  • “Only issue is the magsafe ring is just slightly too high.” - matthew

  • “The only real downside is that it doesn't offer the same kind of drop protection as a bulkier case would.” -  Thomas & Sara

👍 Helpful Article: Discover the top 5 Samsung S25, S25+, and S25 Ultra cases for summer 2025 - lightweight picks designed for heat, travel, and everyday use.

Who Each Case Is For

Choosing between the PITAKA S25 Ultra case and the Thinborne S25 Ultra case isn’t about which one is better - it’s about which one fits your priorities.


Choose the PITAKA S25 Ultra case if you want:

  • A smooth, refined texture

  • Compatibility with PITAKA’s MagEZ ecosystem

  • A trusted, well-established global brand

Choose the Thinborne S25 Ultra case if you want:

  • Slightly enhanced grip for everyday handling

  • Included extras like screen protectors and a longer warranty

  • Support for a smaller, detail-oriented brand

💬 Learn More: Find out whether an S24 Ultra case will fit the S25 Ultra - plus expert tips on choosing the right case for the best fit and protection.

What People Say About Us

Conclusion

The comparison between Thinborne and the PITAKA S25 Ultra case shows just how popular minimalist cases have become. Both options deliver on slim design, premium materials, and modern magnetic compatibility. Where they differ is in philosophy.


The PITAKA S25 Ultra case reflects a classic premium approach - refined and brand-driven. On the other hand, Thinborne’s thin phone case focuses on practical value and grip - offering a slightly different take on minimalism.


Neither case is objectively better (they’re actually both good choices). They’re simply designed for different users. If you value brand prestige, PITAKA may make more sense. But if you care more about included value and longer-term support, Thinborne may be the better fit.


Watch this Thinborne S25 Ultra case review to get more acquainted with our phone case:

Products Featured In This Blog

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use these cases with a car MagSafe mount?

Yes. Both cases work well with magnetic mounts. Thinborne uses a built-in magnet array for extra stability.

How scratch-resistant are these cases?

The aramid fiber material resists minor scratches and daily wear, but like all cases, it won’t prevent deep gouges or damage from sharp objects.

Can these cases handle drops?

They offer protection from everyday bumps and minor drops, but they are not designed for extreme shock or heavy-duty drop protection.

Do the colors fade over time?

The finishes on both cases are durable. PITAKA’s silky finish and Thinborne’s textured weave are designed to retain their look with regular use.

Related Readings

author bio pic

Written by Angela

"I believe tech should be fun, not complicated—and that’s why I love writing about it. When I’m not writing, you’ll find me living my faith, spoiling my dogs, or caring for my cats, turtles, birds, and chickens (a full house of love!)."

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar