PITAKA vs Latercase Thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 Case: In-depth Review of Features 2026

Ultra-thin cases are very popular among Galaxy Z Flip 7 users who want protection without ruining the phone’s sleek feel. 

Two of the most talked-about options are PITAKA and Latercase. Both focus on minimalist design and aramid fiber builds, but they take slightly different approaches.

In this guide, we take a closer look at PITAKA vs the Latercase thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 case and break down their features, materials, and real-world usability. 

We’ll also introduce a third option (aka best alternative!) for a Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 case that sits right between them in key areas. So, watch out for that!

Before diving into the details, let’s look at a quick side-by-side overview of PITAKA and Latercase. This helps highlight where these two thin cases differ most.

Now let’s take an even closer look at PITAKA vs Latercase thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 case features…

At just 0.6 mm, the Latercase thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 Case is designed to feel almost invisible on your phone. It’s one of the thinnest options available for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7, and one reason is because it doesn’t have a built-in magnet like the others. But that’s for the next sections.

PITAKA is also very slim, but slightly thicker than Latercase at around 1.02 mm. In real-world use, their difference is very small.

However, if your main goal is to get the lightest, most bare-phone feel possible, Latercase has the edge here.

Both PITAKA and Latercase follow a minimalist design philosophy - no bulky feel and no flashy accents.

PITAKA features a refined woven twill pattern that gives the case a premium look. The weave is subtle yet elegant, matching the Z Flip 7’s modern design. Compared to Latercase, PITAKA definitely has the most design and color options.

Latercase also features a simple design. Its matte finish and smooth edges aim for a clean, almost skin-like appearance.

In short, both PITAKA and Latercase feel and look luxurious.

PITAKA clearly states on its product page that it uses 600D aerospace-grade aramid fiber. This material is known for being lightweight and strong. It’s used in aerospace applications and is now commonly used in premium thin cases.

Latercase also uses aramid fiber, but it does not specify the denier rating in its official product information. It simply describes the case as being made from “premium aramid fibers.”

That doesn’t mean that Latercase’s material is of poor quality. But for buyers who care about technical transparency, PITAKA provides more detailed material information than the Latercase thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 Case.

MagSafe compatibility often plays a big role in buying decisions, especially for users who rely on magnetic accessories every day.

PITAKA is MagSafe compatible and supports magnetic accessories, which makes it compatible with magnetic chargers, car mounts, stands, etc., designed for MagSafe use.

Latercase, on the other hand, does not advertise MagSafe compatibility on its official website. Yes, it supports wireless charging, but there are no built-in magnets for alignment or magnetic accessories.

Now, this distinction matters as wireless charging alone does not equal MagSafe. If you rely on magnetic accessories, PITAKA has a clear advantage here.

Both cases focus on everyday protection rather than heavy-duty drop defense.

PITAKA protects against scratches, scuffs, and general daily wear. It’s designed to keep your phone protected while staying slim.

Latercase offers similar scratch protection and includes a raised lip around the camera for added peace of mind. However, like most ultra-thin cases, it’s not meant for serious drops (especially since it’s super super slim).

Remember, if you’re expecting rugged protection, neither case is the right choice (sorry). Both PITAKA and Latercase are for careful users who value form over armor.

The pricing between the PITAKA and Latercase is very competitive.

Pitaka is priced at $59.99.

Latercase is priced at $59.00 (usually sold at full price).

With regard to the price, the decision comes down more to what features you prioritize most than the cost. Keep in mind that you’re paying for design and materials rather than heavy-duty protection.

It helps to see the strengths and weaknesses of PITAKA and Latercase at a glance. Both cases target minimalists, but they appeal to slightly different priorities.

If you like aspects of PITAKA and Latercase but want something in between, there is another option worth considering…

Thinborne positions itself as a balanced alternative when considering getting a Z Flip 7 ultra-thin aramid fiber case.

In terms of thickness, Thinborne sits between Latercase and PITAKA. At roughly 1.016 mm, it is technically thinner than PITAKA but slightly thicker than Latercase. In real use, it remains very slim while offering extra features.

Thinborne also clearly states the use of 600D aramid fiber, matching PITAKA’s material transparency. And unlike Latercase, Thinbore is MagSafe-ready - making it suitable for magnetic accessories (chargers, wallets, mounts, etc.).

Another key difference is the grip. Thinborne uses a carbon fiber–style texture that adds traction without sticking to your pocket. This can make the phone feel more secure compared to smoother finishes.

Thinbore is therefore a good alternative to PITAKA and Latercase for users who want:

• Slightly slimmer specs than PITAKA

• MagSafe compatibility

• 600D aramid fiber material

• Color options (Black, Wild Navy, Crimson)

• Free tempered glass screen protector
  

Indeed, Thinborne fills that middle ground between PITAKA and Latercase nicely. The table below will help you understand their overall design better:

Thinborne was also featured in Android Central. SpookDroid said:

“I've always loved these cases as they are the thinnest I've ever seen. Been using them for the past 3+ years and don't regret it (well, OK, I regret they're not transparent, but that's the trade off with the durability of this thin material that still looks awesome, but won't show off the phone's color).”

And Nerd Voices from Nerd Bot said in their article:

“We’ve seen many slim cases for the Galaxy Z Flip 7, but one truly stood out to us. ThinBorne’s approach to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 does something rare. It makes the case feel like it belongs to the phone, not just on it. This small brand of aramid fiber thin phone cases from Frisco, Texas, believes in no-nonsense ‘modern’ protection.”

Also, check this out on X:

And if you want to see more of Thinborne’s ultra-thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 case, watch this:

Deciding between the PITAKA and the Latercase thin Galaxy Z Flip 7 case depends on what you value most.

Latercase is all about maximum thinness. It’s ideal for users who want their Z Flip 7 to feel almost naked and don’t need MagSafe.

PITAKA, on the other hand, offers a more feature-rich experience. You get MagSafe compatibility, a premium woven design, and clearly stated materials (600D aramid fiber), at the cost of a bit more thickness.

However, if you want a balance of slim design, MagSafe support, and premium material (also 600D aramid fiber), Thinborne’s thin phone case stands out as a strong alternative that sits right between the two.